Created at 10pm, Mar 21
btcdharmaBook
0
INTRODUCTION THE U.S. LEGAL SYSTEM
qvY_dQ3tz3-zK9_zTJa0CnX1G0ZtVkeb3a5wFcuRVbo
File Type
PDF
Entry Count
612
Embed. Model
jina_embeddings_v2_base_en
Index Type
hnsw

Every business day, courts throughoutthe United States render decisions thattogether affect many thousands ofpeople. Some affect only the parties toa particular legal action, but others adjudicate rights, benefits, and legalprinciples that have an impact on virtually all Americans. Inevitably, manyAmericans may welcome a given ruling while others — sometimes manyothers — disapprove. All, however, accept the legitimacy of these decisions,and of the courts’ role as final interpreter of the law. There can be nomore potent demonstration of thetrust that Americans place in the ruleof law and their confidence in the U.S.legal system.The pages that follow survey thatsystem. Much of the discussion explains how U.S. courts are organizedand how they work. Courts are centralto the legal system, but they are notthe entire system. Every day acrossAmerica, federal, state, and localcourts interpret laws, adjudicate disputes under laws, and at times evenstrike down laws as violating the fundamental protections that the Constitution guarantees all Americans. Atthe same time, millions of Americanstransact their day-to-day affairs without turning to the courts. They, too,rely upon the legal system. The youngcouple purchasing their first home,two businessmen entering into a contract, parents drawing up a will to provide for their children — all requires the predictability and enforceablecommon norms that the rule of lawprovides and the U.S. legal systemguarantees.This introduction seeks to familiarize readers with the basic structureand vocabulary of American law.Subsequent chapters add detail, andafford a sense of how the U.S. legalsystem has evolved to meet theneeds of a growing nation and itsever more complex economic andsocial realities.

Role of the Judge During the Trial The judges role in the trial, although very important, is a relatively passive 110 OUTLINE OF THE U.S. LEGAL SYSTEM Prosecutors and police display a seizure of more than $45 million worth of heroin and cocaine. Illegal drug traffic belongs under either one of two categories of crime: organized crime and consensual crime, also known as victimless crime, because both the perpetrator and the client desire the forbidden activity. Witnesses and physical evidence form the principal elements of the prosecutions case in most trials. Left: Tampa Police Department investigators take fingerprint samples in an attempt to trace an accused terrorist. Above: An expert witness points to a chart of the parking lot where an alleged crime took place.
id: 2d4961ddf25cf550b31facfe18fdfa73 - page: 109
He or she does not present any evidence or take an active part in the the witnesses. The examination of judge is called upon to rule on the many motions of the prosecutor and of the defense attorney regarding the types of evidence that may be presented and the kinds of questions that may be asked of the witnesses. In some jurisdictions the judge is permitted to ask substantive questions of the witnesses and also to comment to the jury about the credibility of the evidence that is presented; in other states the judge is constrained from such activity. Still, the American legal tradition has room for a variety of judicial styles that depend on the personality, training, and wisdom of individual judges.
id: be4e6e3d31646f18f5644812ccafb0d9 - page: 111
First and foremost, the judge is expected to play the part of a disinterested party whose primary job is to see to it that both sides are allowed to present their cases as fully as possible the law. If within the confines of judges depart from the appearance or practice of being fair and neutral parties, they run counter to fundamental tenets of American jurisprudence and risk having their decisions overturned by an appellate court. Although judges do for the most part play such a role, the backgrounds and values of the jurists also affect their decisions in the close calls when they are called upon to rule on a motion for which the arguments CHAPTER 5: THE CRIMINAL COURT PROCESS 111 are about equally strong or on a point of law that is open to a variety of interpretations. Role of the Jury During the Trial
id: 57592658a87dadb55fca1ce77559bc6f - page: 111
The jurors role during the trial is passive. Their job is to listen attentively to the cases presented by the opposing attorneys and then come to a decision based solely on the evidence that is set forth. They are ordinarily not permitted to ask questions either of the witnesses or of the judge, nor are they allowed to take notes of the proceedings. This is not because of constitutional or statutory prohibitions but primarily because it has been the traditional practice of courts in America. In recent years, however, many judges have allowed jurors to become more involved in the judicial arena. Chicagos Chief U.S. District Court Judge John F. Grady has for over a decade permitted jurors in his courtroom to take notes. At least four U.S. appellate courts have given tacit approval to the practice of juror participation in questioning witnesses, as long as jurors are not permitted to blurt out queries in the midst of trial and attorneys are given a chance to object to sp
id: 6bba3d4e5bd17f25f3723888f0cc5a9c - page: 111
How to Retrieve?
# Search

curl -X POST "https://search.dria.co/hnsw/search" \
-H "x-api-key: <YOUR_API_KEY>" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"rerank": true, "top_n": 10, "contract_id": "qvY_dQ3tz3-zK9_zTJa0CnX1G0ZtVkeb3a5wFcuRVbo", "query": "What is alexanDRIA library?"}'
        
# Query

curl -X POST "https://search.dria.co/hnsw/query" \
-H "x-api-key: <YOUR_API_KEY>" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"vector": [0.123, 0.5236], "top_n": 10, "contract_id": "qvY_dQ3tz3-zK9_zTJa0CnX1G0ZtVkeb3a5wFcuRVbo", "level": 2}'